Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Is Photobucket better than Picassa?

  1. #1
    Junior Googler

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    29

    Is Photobucket better than Picassa?

    The first one has more features and it can be seen in a more organized way. For example, if you want to use the photos on a website Photobucket does the HTML work for you and gives you exactly the source.

  2. #2
    Junior Googler

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    30
    I use photobucket whenever I have an image I need to display on the web via html just for that reason. On the other hand, I direct clients to Picassa because ownership of photos is very obscure and Picassa's format helps to deal with the issue. I always tell clients to make sure their photos are well watermarked and digimarked and de res'd and sized appropriately whenever sharing them on the internet. Again, this is a case of two thematically similar applications with different contexts for preferred use.

  3. #3
    Noogle

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3
    Picassa is a great tool to use for images than photobucket.For technical reasons also picassa is good.

  4. #4
    Senior Googler
    Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    117
    well I use both of them, but I still find that photobucket is better than all the rest image hosting.

  5. #5
    Googler
    credasys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    53
    For me, I also prefer to use photobucket than in picassa.

Similar Threads

  1. anyone here using photobucket?
    By microdude431 in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-12-2010, 05:05 PM
  2. Inability to upload pics. to Picassa Web Album
    By reyasmit in forum Picasa and Picasa Web Albums
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-18-2007, 02:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •